Nano Banana Video Generator
このページは Nano Banana の動画に関する最も広い検索意図を受け止め、画像から動画、テキストから動画、プロンプト、料金・制限ページへ振り分けます。
ログイン前にプレビュー可能
登録後に無料トライアル
プロンプト主導と画像主導の両方に対応
このページの役割
ブランド全体の意図を受け止めつつ、より狭い検索意図は各専用ページに渡します。
ブランド全体の意図
Nano Banana video、generator、maker などの広い検索を受け止めます。
ワークフローの振り分け
画像から動画、テキストから動画、プロンプト、料金制限へ案内します。
商用転換
高意図ユーザーを実際のツールへ直接送ります。
おすすめの流れ
このページは総合入口として機能し、すべての細部を抱え込まない構成が適しています。
ステップ 1
まず、出発点がテキストか画像かを決めます。
ステップ 2
プロンプトが曖昧なら、先にプロンプトジェネレーターでカメラ、動き、シーンを整理します。
ステップ 3
準備ができたら動画ツールに進み、ログイン後に生成を開始します。
What people need before they click generate
Broad video queries hide three very different jobs: choosing the workflow, understanding the current model limits, and getting a stable first result.
Choose the right workflow first
Most users do not need another brand summary. They need to know which path reduces uncertainty fastest.
- Use text-to-video when you only have an idea and need the scene, action, and camera built from scratch.
- Use image-to-video when the product, character, or composition is already approved and you only need motion.
- Use Veo 3.1 Fast for short 8-second iterations, and use Sora 2 when you need 10-second or 15-second runs.
Understand the live product limits
This project does not expose one generic black-box model. The available options shape what users can realistically expect.
- The current video tool exposes Sora 2, Sora 2 Pro, and Veo 3.1 Fast rather than a single default video model.
- The workflow supports both text-to-video and image-to-video, with 16:9 and 9:16 framing in the public tool.
- Generation is not instant: the product warns users to expect roughly 2 to 10 minutes depending on the model.
Get a better first pass
Most failed first generations come from vague motion direction, not from missing style adjectives.
- Keep the prompt structured around subject, action, camera movement, lighting, and mood.
- If the first output has the right scene but weak motion, rewrite only the motion and camera lines instead of replacing everything.
- If the result drifts away from your intended framing, switch to image-to-video or use start/end frames for a tighter motion target.
Which model or workflow should you choose first?
Most broad traffic is really trying to answer one decision question: which option gets me to a usable result with the least wasted time or credits?
Veo 3.1 Fast
Best when you want quick iterations and short outputs without waiting on a longer quality pass.
- Supports text-to-video and image-to-video in the current product flow.
- Runs at 8 seconds and 720p with 16:9 or 9:16 framing.
- Good default for testing concept, pacing, and prompt logic before spending more.
Sora 2 Fast
Best when the key question is duration rather than final quality, especially for 10-second and 15-second tests.
- Supports 10-second and 15-second runs at 720p.
- Works for both text-to-video and image-to-video variants.
- Useful when 8 seconds is too short but you still want to stay below pro-level cost.
Sora 2 Pro
Best when the scene direction is already right and you are ready to pay for higher-quality output.
- Adds 1080p quality mode on top of 10-second and 15-second duration choices.
- Costs significantly more, so it makes sense later in the workflow, not at the idea-validation stage.
- Use it after prompt, framing, and motion direction are already stable.
関連ページ
Nano Banana のワークフローをさらに確認する
これらの支援ページは隣接する検索意図を受け止め、製品ツールへ戻します。
FAQ
ページ意図を絞り込み、主要な疑問に答え、次の行動を明確にします。